Russell v. Pritzker
| Michael Russell |
| J B Pritzker |
| 3:2020cv03298 |
| November 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sara Darrow |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT entered. (KE, ilcd) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 12/9/2020. On November 9, 2020, the Court struck Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus #1 because he did not sign his pleading as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 but granted Plaintiff twenty-one days to file a corrected pleading. The Court admonished Plaintiff that failure to timely comply would result in dismissal of this case. Thirty days have passed, and Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order or move for an extension of time to comply. Therefore, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's case without prejudice. The Court deems moot all motions, deadlines, and hearings. Civil Case Terminated. (KE, ilcd)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 11/9/2020. The Court STRIKES Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a complaint for a writ of mandamus #1 because he has not complied with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, which provides that "every pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by a party personally if the party is unrepresented." Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Plaintiff's filing lacks his signature. The Court also DENIES Plaintiff's motion to enter Defendants #4 . The Court admonishes Plaintiff that any amended pleading he files must contain all allegations against all Defendants. Piecemeal amendments are not accepted. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff twenty-one days to resubmit an amended pleading. Failure to comply will result in the dismissal of Plaintiff's case. (KE, ilcd)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Enter Defendants by Plaintiff Michael Russell. Responses due by 11/18/2020 (KE, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Michael Russell.(KE, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Chief Judge Sara Darrow. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Urbana Division, 201 S Vine Street, Urbana, IL 61802.Merit Review Deadline set for 11/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(KE, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to File Mandamus Petition by Plaintiff Michael Russell. Responses due by 11/18/2020 (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(KE, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Russell v. Pritzker | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Russell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: J B Pritzker | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
