Lee v. Kalern et al
Case Number: 3:2020cv03349
Filed: April 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Springfield Office
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MERIT REVIEW entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 4/6/2021. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's IFP petition ECF 2 is DENIED, as the 3-strikes Plaintiff has failed to plead that he is in imminent dangers of serious physical injury. 28 U .S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff will be given 30 days in which to pay the $402.00 filing fee. The failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. 2. Plaintiff's Motion f or Service at Government Expense ECF 4 , is DENIED. Plaintiff files a letter ECF 9 and related motion, asking that another inmate be allowed to make payment of the remainder of the filing fee [ECF 10] on his behalf. While Plaintiff does not ad dress it, the Court believes it likely that IDOC prohibits one inmate making payment on the obligations of another and will, therefore, DENY Plaintiff's ECF 10 for this reason. Plaintiff's motion for status 11 , is rendered MOOT by this order. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. Kalern et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?