Sloat v. Jeffreys et al
| Andrew S. Sloat |
| Rob Jeffreys, John/Jane Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 2 and Glynn Austin |
| 3:2021cv03086 |
| April 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER from Stateville Correctional Center by Andrew S. Sloat. (GL) |
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT entered. (SEE WRITTEN JUDGMENT.) (GL) |
| Filing 10 MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Petitioner's second petition to proceed in forma pauperis (d/e #8 ) is GRANTED on the grounds of indigency. Petitioner's initial petition to proceed in forma pauperis (d/e #7 ) is DENIED as moot. Petitioner's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Because amendment would be futile, the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 and close the case. (SEE WRITTEN OPINION.) Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 5/4/2021. (GL) |
| Filing 9 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Andrew S. Sloat. (GL) |
| Filing 8 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Central District of Illinois form), filed by Andrew S. Sloat.(GL) |
| Filing 7 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Northern District of Illinois form), filed by Andrew S. Sloat.(GL) |
| Filing 6 Letter from Plaintiff Andrew S Sloat re IFP forms. (GL) |
TEXT ORDER entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus #1 but has not paid the $402 filing fee nor filed a petition to proceed in forma pauperis. Within 21 days of the entry of this order, Petitioner must pay the $402 filing fee in full or file a petition to proceed in forma pauperis with attached trust fund ledgers for the last 6 months. Failure to comply without good cause will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice, and the Petitioner will still be responsible for payment of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1914. The Clerk is directed to send Petitioner the forms for proceeding in forma pauperis. Entered by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 4/21/2021. (GL)
|
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Illinois Southern; Case Number 3:21-cv-00368. . |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO OTHER DISTRICT: Plaintiff has submitted a mandamus petition seeking sentence credit. He is incarcerated at the Graham Correctional Center where he is serving a state sentence. He names as Defendants the Warden and records officer of Graham Correctional Center, the Prisoner Review Board, and the Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections. (Doc. #1 ). Venue for a federal civil action is governed by 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1391(b). According to that statute, such actions may be brought only in (1) the judicial district where any defendant resides (if all defendants reside in the same State), (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction with respect to the action, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought. None of the Defendants appear to reside within the Southern District of Illinois. A substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to Plaintiff's allegations occurred at the Graham Correctional Center in Montgomery County, Illinois, which is situated in the federal judicial district for the Central District of Illinois. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 93(b). The Court therefore finds that the Central District is the appropriate forum for the hearing and determination of this mandamus action. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1404(a), and on the Court's own motion, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, for such further proceedings as that court may deem appropriate. No summons shall issue in this action unless so directed by the transferee court.Case transferred to Central District of Illinois. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 4/9/2021. (beb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Andrew S. Sloat to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Andrew S. Sloat on 04/07/2021. Consent due by 4/28/2021 (kare) |
| Filing 2 Letter from from USDC/SDIL to Petitioner. (kare) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus filed by Andrew S. Sloat.(kare) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
