Gragg et al v. K9 Wild
| Micheal W Gragg and Tracey M Gragg |
| K9 Wild |
| 3:2021cv03170 |
| July 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Plaintiff Tracey Gragg has filed a Notice of Death #3 indicating that her husband Plaintiff Michael Gragg died on 7/30/2021. Tracey Gragg further asks to be substituted in for Plaintiff Michael Gragg to pursue his claims in this action. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a) Tracey Gragg is substituted in for Plaintiff Michael Gragg to pursue his claims in this case. Entered by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 8/23/2021. (GL)
|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable, re #1 NEF of Complaint. Envelope marked RTS - Deceased. (GL) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEATH and Notice of Change of Address by Tracey M Gragg. New address: Tracey M. Gragg, P.O. Box 9633, Springfield, IL 62794. (GL) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiffs Micheal W Gragg and Tracey M Gragg. Responses due by 8/5/2021. (GL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against K9 Wild, filed by Micheal W Gragg and Tracey M Gragg. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(GL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
