Apalone Inc. v. Schutt Sports LLC et al
| Apalone, Inc. and Apalone Inc. |
| Schutt Sports, LLC, Certor Sports, LLC, Schutt Sports LLC and Certor Sports LLC |
| 3:2021cv03186 |
| August 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent 8,938,817 by Plaintiff Apalone Inc.. Responses due by 11/5/2021 (Niro, Raymond) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins: Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference held on 10/22/2021 with Attorneys Kyle Wallenberg, Raymond Niro Jr., Bailey Benedict, Matthew Trapp, and Thad Kodish. Written Scheduling Order to follow. Parties are reminded of their option to consent to proceed before US Magistrate Judge. See attached form. (LB) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent 8,938,817 by Defendants Certor Sports LLC, Schutt Sports LLC. Responses due by 11/12/2021 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Bailey Benedict, #2 Declaration of Vince Long, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6, #9 Exhibit 7, #10 Exhibit 8, #11 Exhibit 9, #12 Exhibit 10, #13 Exhibit 11-A, #14 Exhibit 11-B, #15 Exhibit 11-C, #16 Exhibit 11-D, #17 Exhibit 12, #18 Exhibit 13, #19 Exhibit 14, #20 Exhibit 15, #21 Exhibit 16, #22 Exhibit 17, #23 Exhibit 18-A, #24 Exhibit 18-B, #25 Exhibit 18-C, #26 Exhibit 18-D, #27 Exhibit 19-A, #28 Exhibit 19-B, #29 Exhibit 19-C, #30 Exhibit 20)(Kodish, Thad) |
| Filing 16 DISCOVERY PLAN - PROPOSED/Report of Rule 26(f)Planning Meeting by Apalone Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan, #2 Exhibit B - Defendants' Proposed Discovery Plan)(Wallenberg, Kyle) |
| Filing 15 Plaintiff's ANSWER to #8 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Apalone Inc..(Niro, Raymond) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Wonjoon Chung on behalf of Certor Sports LLC, Schutt Sports LLC (Chung, Wonjoon) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Bailey Benedict on behalf of Certor Sports LLC, Schutt Sports LLC (Benedict, Bailey) |
| NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set Friday, 10/22/2021, at 9:30 AM (court will place call) before U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Attorneys are directed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) by meeting as soon as practicable, and in any event at least fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduling conference, and are to submit a proposed discovery plan in writing to the Court on or before 10/20/2021. Such a plan must include, at a minimum, those items listed in CDIL-LR 26.2(3), Rule 16(b), Rule 26(f), and CDIL-LR 16.2(E) with proposed deadlines. The parties are directed to specifically address the provisions, if any, for discovery or disclosure of electronically stored information, and to discuss agreements, if any, the parties reach for asserting claims of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material, after inadvertent production. Any plan filed shall specifically address the need, or lack thereof, concerning discovery of electronically stored information. If a discovery plan is not submitted as required, the scheduling hearing will not be held and costs may be assessed. Lead counsel or other counsel of record with knowledge of the case should be available to participate in the Rule 16 scheduling hearing. (LB) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Matthew Robert Trapp on behalf of All Defendants (Trapp, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David A Herman on behalf of All Defendants (Herman, David) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Defendants Schutt Sports, LLC and Certor Sports, LLC's Corporate Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 (Kodish, Thad) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Certor Sports LLC, Schutt Sports LLC. (Kodish, Thad) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES , COUNTERCLAIM against Apalone Inc. by Certor Sports LLC, Schutt Sports LLC.(Kodish, Thad) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Apalone Inc.. All Defendants. (Niro, Raymond) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Certor Sports LLC, Schutt Sports LLC. Originals returned to Attorney Raymond P. Niro, Jr. to effectuate service. (GL) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Kyle David Wallenberg on behalf of Apalone, Inc. (Wallenberg, Kyle) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Raymond P Niro, Jr on behalf of Apalone, Inc. (Niro, Raymond) |
| Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent by Apalone, Inc.. (Niro, Raymond) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Apalone, Inc.. (Niro, Raymond) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Certor Sports, LLC, Schutt Sports, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-3743527.), filed by Apalone, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit U.S. Patent No. 8,938,817, #2 Exhibit U.S. Patent No. 10,617,167, #3 Exhibit Decision in IPR2020-00501, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Supplement Summons for Certor Sports, LLC, #6 Supplement Summons for Schutt Sports, LLC)(Niro, Raymond) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
