Woodall v. Brookhart
Petitioner: Robert M Woodall
Respondent: Warden Deanna Brookhart
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2021cv03221
Filed: October 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Colin Stirling Bruce
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2021 Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Petitioner Robert M Woodall. (SKR)
December 1, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION to Change Caption by Petitioner Robert M Woodall. Responses due by 12/15/2021 (JMB)
December 1, 2021 Filing 9 RULE 12(C) NOTICE entered re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (JMB)
December 1, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Respondent Deanna Brookhart. Responses due by 12/15/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Cebula, Michael)
November 19, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address (to Illinois River Correctional Center) by Robert M Woodall. (SKN)
November 9, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Robert M Woodall to Illinois River Correctional Center (SKR)
October 21, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Michael L Cebula on behalf of Deanna Brookhart (Cebula, Michael)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 10/20/21. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) Petitioners Motion for Appointment of Counsel #3 is DENIED without prejudice. (2) Respondent Deanna Brookhart, Warden, has sixty (60) days to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the Petition #1 . SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (SKR)
October 20, 2021 Set/Reset Deadlines: Other Deadline set for answer due 12/6/2021. (SKR)
October 14, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION to Request Counsel by Petitioner Robert M Woodall. Responses due by 10/28/2021 (MAS)
October 14, 2021 Filing 2 BRIEF in Support of #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.) by Robert M Woodall. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, A-1 and A-2, #2 Exhibit A-3, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit E, #5 Exhibits 1, #6 Exhibits 2, #7 Exhibits 3, #8 Exhibit A-5, #9 Affidavit)(MAS)
October 14, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00), filed by Robert M Woodall.(MAS)
October 14, 2021 Filing fee: $ 5.00 paid, receipt number 34626012734 (MAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodall v. Brookhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert M Woodall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Deanna Brookhart
Represented By: Michael L Cebula
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: Habeas Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?