Kirchner v. Wolfe et al
| Michael William Kirchner |
| Lt. Wolfe, Lt. Grant, Nurse Nixon, Illinois Dept. of Corrections and Tina Jepsen |
| 4:2017cv04061 |
| February 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Rock Island Office |
| Rock Island |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Defendants' motion for summary judgment on the exhaustion of administrative remedies is granted 29 . This case is dismissed, without prejudice, for Plainitff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies before f iling this case. All other pending motions are denied as moot 19 , 21 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 34 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 45 , 48 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 57 , 58 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 65 . The clerk is directed to close this case. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/07/2017. (SKN, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
9
MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Case proceeds. Motion to Request Counsel 5 denied; Motion for copies of all documents in the docket 6 denied. Clerk is to enter a standard order granting Plaintiff's in forma pauperis petition and attempt service on Defendants. A standard qualified protective order pursuant to the HIPAA is also to be entered. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 04/17/2017. (SKN, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
