Mackel v. Hou et al
| David Mackel |
| Grace B Hou, Jeremie Seymour, Paula Lodge, Sharon Coleman, Kristen Wilcoxen, Gregg Scott, James McCurry, Javier Perez, Wanda Pennock, Diana Dobier, . Clayton and Charles Wilson |
| 4:2020cv04015 |
| January 30, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Michael M Mihm |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Letter from Clerk of Court to Rushville TDF Trust Fund Dept. requesting ledgers 7/30/19 through 1/30/20 (SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Michael Mihm. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division, 100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria, IL 61602. Merit Review Deadline set for 2/20/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff David Mackel. Responses due by 2/13/2020 (SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David Mackel. Responses due by 2/13/2020 (SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by David Mackel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 proposed summons, #3 scanning pages)(SAG, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
