Ashford v. Pennock
Plaintiff: Anthony Ashford
Defendant: Wanda Pennock
Case Number: 4:2020cv04090
Filed: April 14, 2020
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Rock Island Office
Presiding Judge: Michael M Mihm
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 4/14/2020. IT IS ORDERED: 2) Plaintiff Ashford's complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. 1915A, due to misjoinder. Plaintiff Ashford will have 30 days in which to file an amended complaint consistent with the instruction given in this order. The Clerk is to sever Plaintiff Ashford's case from that of Plaintiff Anderson and to open a separate case for Plaintiff Ashford. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within the time allowed, his complaint will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff's pleading is to be captioned Amended Complaint and is to include all of his claims without reference to a prior pleading. Plaintiff Ashford's Petition to Proceed IFP #5 is dismissed here and will be refiled in the newly opened case. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd)
April 14, 2020 Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. by Anthony Ashford (SAG, ilcd)
April 14, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Anthony Ashford. Responses due by 4/28/2020 (SAG, ilcd)
April 14, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Michael Mihm. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division, 100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria, IL 61602. Merit Review Deadline set for 5/4/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG, ilcd)
April 14, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wanda Pennock, filed by Anthony Ashford.(SAG, ilcd)
April 14, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER: This Court has instituted a reduced payment procedure for indigent plaintiffs who are institutionalized but who are not prisoners as defined in 28 USC Section 1915(h). A reduced payment is assessed of 50% of such plaintiff's average monthly income for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint (not to exceed the $400 filing fee). Income includes all deposits from any source. The plaintiff Anthony Ashford is currently detained at Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility, and is thus subject to the reduced payment procedure. However, the plaintiff's ledgers for the past six months show an average monthly income of $1.00 or less. No reduced filing fee will be assessed. Entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 4/14/2020. (SAG, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ashford v. Pennock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wanda Pennock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Ashford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?