USA v. $43,250.00 in US Currency et al
USA |
$43,250.00 in US Currency and $25,660.00 in US Currency |
4:2021cv04080 |
May 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Sara Darrow |
Jonathan E Hawley |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 10 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Plaintiff USA. Responses due by 6/22/2021 (Kim, Richard) |
![]() |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint for Forfeiture by $43,250.00 in US Currency.(Mangieri, Paul) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint for Forfeiture by $25,660.00 in US Currency.(Mangieri, Paul) |
Filing 6 CLAIM Interest in $25,660.00 U.S. Currency by Defendant $25,660.00 in US Currency. (Mangieri, Paul) |
Filing 5 CLAIM Interest in $43,250.00 U.S. Currency by Defendant $43,250.00 in US Currency. (Mangieri, Paul) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF CIVIL FORFEITURE ACTION TO JOHN THIELBERT AND MATEO AGUIRRE (Kim, Richard) |
Filing 3 WARRANT for Arrest in REM Returned Executed (RES) |
Filing 2 +++ WARRANT/WRIT OF BODY ATTACHMENT issued (sealed). (RES) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet, #2 285 form 1, #3 285 form 2, #4 Warrant for Arrest in REM)(RES) (Attachment 4 replaced on 5/3/2021) (RES). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.