Bell v. Donothan
Plaintiff: Timothy Bell
Defendant: Greg Donothan
Case Number: 4:2022cv04137
Filed: September 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: James E Shadid
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 11/4/2022. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED with leave to renew. #3 2) The complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. 1915A. 2) If Plaintiff believes he can cure the deficiencies noted in his complaint, he may file an amended complaint on or before November 28, 2022. The pleading must be titled "Amended Complaint" and must include all claims and Defendants without reference to the initial complaint. Failure to file an amended complaint by the deadline will result in the dismissal of this case for failure to state a claim. 3) The Clerk of the Court is directed to reset the internal merit review deadline within 21 days of this order. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG)
September 27, 2022 Filing 5 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER (SAG)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER: This Court has instituted a reduced payment procedure for indigent plaintiffs who are institutionalized but who are not prisoners as defined in 28 USC Section 1915(h). A reduced payment is assessed of 50% of such plaintiff's average monthly income for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint (not to exceed the $402 filing fee). Income includes all deposits from any source. The plaintiff Timothy Bell is currently detained at Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility, and is thus subject to the reduced payment procedure. However, the plaintiff's ledgers for the past six months show an average monthly income of $1.00 or less. No reduced filing fee will be assessed. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 9/27/2022. (SAG)
September 26, 2022 Filing 4 Letter Requesting Trust Fund Ledger. Trust fund ledger sheets due by 10/11/2022. (SAG)
September 26, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Timothy Bell. Responses due by 10/11/2022 (SAG)
September 26, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge James Shadid. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division, 100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria, IL 61602. Merit Review Deadline set for 10/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG)
September 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Greg Donothan, filed by Timothy Bell.(SAG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bell v. Donothan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greg Donothan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?