Williams et al v. Blagojevich et al
1:2005cv04673 |
August 15, 2005 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
William T. Hart |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 504 MOTION by Defendant Bruce Rauner for judgment order re attorney fees and costs (Stratton, Brent) |
Filing 395 Opinion and Order: The Monitor's reports are approved. The Monitor is requested to provide the most recent Critical Incident Report, his comments thereon and any available comparative date with all future reports to the court. Mario Durham's motion for a hearing 375 is denied. A status hearing will be held on July 10, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. Signed by the Honorable William T. Hart on 1/10/2014:Mailed notice(clw, ) |
Filing 339 MOTION by Plaintiffs Edward Brandon, Gilbert Parham, Ethel Williams, Jan Wrightsell for judgment (Agreed Motion) (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wolf, Benjamin) |
Filing 325 OPINION and Order Signed by the Honorable William T. Hart on 9/29/2010. (gmr, ) |
Filing 285 OPINION and Order Signed by the Honorable William T. Hart on 7/27/2010. (gmr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Williams et al v. Blagojevich et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.