Sullivan v. Jamison
1:2006cv05240 |
September 27, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
James B. Zagel |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 116 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 3/8/2011: Plaintiffs-counter defendants, Frank Sullivan and Rude Music Inc. (collectively Sullivan), move for summary judgment on defendants-counter plaintiffs, Jimmy Jamison and Step han Ellis, counterclaim on the basis that neither Jamison nor Ellis disclosed their claims for any Survivor royalties when filing for bankruptcy protection. For the reasons that follow, Sullivans motion for summary judgment 82 is denied. Mailed notice (For further detail see Written Opinion) (nf, ) |
Filing 85 WRITTEN Opinion before Honorable Michael T. Mason: Plaintiff's motion for entry of a protective order 72 is denied. Counterclaimants' motion for protective order 73 is granted in part and denied in part. The 1/12/11 status hearing stands. (See Written Opinion for further detail) (rbf, ) |
Filing 66 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 12/1/2010:Mailed notice(keg, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sullivan v. Jamison | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.