Illinois Central Railroad Company v. BXB Corporation

Plaintiff: Illinois Central Railroad Company
Defendant: BXB Corporation
Case Number: 1:2007cv00988
Filed: February 21, 2007
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: George W. Lindberg
Nature of Suit: Commerce ICC Rates, Etc.
Cause of Action: 28:1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 19, 2011 30 Opinion or Order of the Court Plaintiff's motion for turnover from Prince Minerals in a citation proceeding 24 is denied. WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable George W. Lindberg on 1/19/2011. Signed by the Honorable George W. Lindberg on 1/19/2011.Mailed notice(pm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Illinois Central Railroad Company v. BXB Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Illinois Central Railroad Company
Represented By: Richard Michael Kates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BXB Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?