United States Fidelity And Guaranty Company v. Shorenstein Realty Services, LP et al
| United States Fidelity And Guaranty Company |
| Shorenstein Realty Services, LP, Shorenstein Management, Inc., Shorenstein Company, LLC, SRI Michigan Avenue Venture, LLC, SRI Michigan Avenue Management, Inc. and 175 East Delaware Place Homeowners Association |
| 1:2007cv03179 |
| June 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Elaine E. Bucklo |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
443
MOTION by Third Party Plaintiffs National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, SRI Michigan Avenue Management, Inc., SRI Michigan Avenue Venture, LLC, Shorenstein Company, LLC, Shorenstein Management, Inc., Shorenstein Realty Services, LP for judgment Motion for Entry of Judgment Order pursuant to Rule 58 (Underwood, Thomas)
|
|
Filing
426
MOTION by Third Party Plaintiffs National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, SRI Michigan Avenue Management, Inc., SRI Michigan Avenue Venture, LLC, Shorenstein Company, LLC, Shorenstein Management, Inc., Shorenstein Realty Services, LP for judgment (Underwood, Thomas)
|
|
Filing
399
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 8/16/2011:Mailed notice(mpj, )
|
|
Filing
345
MOTION by Third Party Plaintiffs National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, SRI Michigan Avenue Management, Inc., SRI Michigan Avenue Venture, LLC, Shorenstein Company, LLC, Shorenstein Management, Inc., Shorenstein Realty Services, LP for judgment Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Rule 58 (Sanders, Michael)
|
|
Filing
341
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 5/11/2011. Mailed notice by judge's staff. (srb,)
|
|
Filing
294
MOTION by Plaintiff National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, Third Party Plaintiffs National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, SRI Michigan Avenue Management, Inc. , SRI Michigan Avenue Management, Inc., SRI Michigan Avenue Venture, LLC, SRI Michigan Avenue Venture, LLC, Shorenstein Company, LLC, Shorenstein Company, LLC, Shorenstein Management, Inc., Shorenstein Management, Inc., Shorenstein Realty Services, L P, Shorenstein Realty Services, LP, Counter Claimants National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, SRI Michigan Avenue Management, Inc., SRI Michigan Avenue Venture, LLC, Shorenstein Company, LLC, Shorenstein Management, Inc., Shorenstein Realty Services, LP, Defendants SRI Michigan Avenue Management, Inc., SRI Michigan Avenue Venture, LLC, Shorenstein Company, LLC, Shorenstein Management, Inc., Shorenstein Realty Services, LP for judgment on Damages (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibits 1 - 10, # 2 Exhibit Exhibits 11 - 25, # 3 Exhibit Exhibits 26-28)(Underwood, Thomas)
|
|
Filing
285
MINUTE entry before Honorable Nan R Nolan: For the reasons explained below, AMICOs Motion to Modify Confidentiality Order 279 is denied.[For further details see text below.]Mailed notice(lxs, )
|
|
Filing
232
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 3/25/2010:Mailed notice(mpj, )
|
|
Filing
141
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 12/8/2008:Mailed notice(mpj, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
