Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. et al v. CMT International, Inc.
| Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. and "K" Line America, Inc. |
| Plano Molding Co. and CMT International, Inc. |
| 1:2007cv05675 |
| October 5, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Harry D. Leinenweber |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
247
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 3/6/2014:Mailed notice(wp, )
|
|
Filing
216
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 12/30/2013. Mailed notice (mgh, )
|
|
Filing
192
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 10/11/2013:Mailed notice(wp, )
|
|
Filing
160
ENTER MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court finds that Plano is bound as a party to the World Bill of Lading and may be held liable to Plaintiffs; Denies Plano's objections to Plaintiffs' Exhibits 2, 9, 18, 20, 21 and 88; Denies the Plain tiffs' objections to Plano's Exhibits 1, 3, and 4; and Sustains the Plaintiff's objections to Plano's Exhibits 2 and 5. Status hearing set for 7/25/2013 to set a trial date on the issues of causation and damages. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 7/19/2013:Mailed notice(wp, )
|
|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 7/27/2011:Mailed notice(wp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
