Capeheart v. Northeastern Illinois University et al
Loretta Capeheart |
Northeastern Illinois University and Melvin C. Terrell |
1:2008cv01423 |
March 10, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Blanche M. Manning |
Sidney I. Schenkier |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1985 Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 244 The defendants' motion for reconsideration [242-1] is granted and the court's order dated June 9, 2011, [239-1] is vacated. The plaintiff's motion for a stay without the requirements of a supersedeas bond 2361 is denied. To obtain a stay, Capeheart must post the bond required under Rule 62(d). WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 6/14/2011: Mailed notice(rth, ) |
Filing 235 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 5/12/2011: The defendants' bill of costs is granted in part and denied in part as follows: costs are awarded in the amount of $3,933.56.Mailed notice(rth, ) |
Filing 222 MEMORANDUM and Order Signed by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 2/14/2011:Mailed notice(rth, ) |
Filing 120 MEMORANDUM and Order Signed by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 3/9/2010:Mailed notice(rth, ) |
Filing 35 MEMORANDUM and Order Signed by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 10/21/2008:Mailed notice(rth, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.