Jackson v. Parker
Plaintiff: Wayne Jackson
Defendant: P.O. Joe Dortha Parker
Case Number: 1:2008cv01958
Filed: April 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Suzanne B. Conlon
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 215 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon on 10/26/2009. Mailed notice(air, )
November 6, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey Cole on 11/6/2008. Mailed notice (cdh, ) Modified on 11/10/2008 (aac, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wayne Jackson
Represented By: Kathleen Coyne Ropka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: P.O. Joe Dortha Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?