Everything Baseball Limited, LLC v. Wilson Sporting Goods Company et al
Plaintiff Everything Baseball Limited, LLC alleged that Defendants Wilson Sporting Goods Company, Hunt Wilson International Ltd., Schutt Sports, Inc., Easton-Bell Sports, Inc., Hillerich & Bradsby Co., Ampac Enterprises, Inc., Rawlings Sporting Goods, Inc., Adidas AG, Reebok International Ltd., Riddell Sports Inc., Diamond Sports Co. Inc. and Nocona Athletic Goods Company infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,161,226 entitled "Baseball Chest Protector".
| Everything Baseball Limited, LLC |
| Wilson Sporting Goods Company, Hunt Wilson International Ltd., Schutt Sports, Inc., Easton-Bell Sports, Inc., Hillerich & Bradsby Co., Ampac Enterprises, Inc., Rawlings Sporting Goods, Inc., Adidas AG, Reebok International Ltd., Riddell Sports Inc,, Diamond Sports Co. Inc. and Nocona Athletic Goods Company |
| 1:2008cv03840 |
| July 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Patent Office |
| Cook |
| Elaine E. Bucklo |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 35:145 Patent Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 5/4/2009:Mailed notice(mpj, )
|
|
Filing
1
COMPLAINT filed by Everything Baseball Limited, LLC; Filing fee $ 350.(kjc, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
