Perry v. Chicago Department of Police et al

Plaintiff: Devaris M. Perry
Defendant: Chicago Department of Police, City of Chicago, Steven Watts, John Doe and Bartel Keithly
Case Number: 1:2008cv04730
Filed: August 27, 2008
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Joan H. Lefkow
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 15, 2011 158 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier on 2/15/2011. Mailed notice.(jj, )
November 3, 2010 128 Opinion or Order of the Court WRITTEN Opinion: Final pretrial conference and motion hearing held. For the reasons stated on the record, the parties' motions in limine ( 108 - 109 , and 111 ) are granted in part and denied in part as summarized below. The Court issued the following rulings on defendants' objections, as set forth on the amended exhibit list, to plaintiff's exhibits: (1) the objections to PX 1 and PX 4 are overruled, based on the limited use for which plaintiff intends to use the exhibits and subject to establishing a foundation for that use; (2) the objections to PX 7 and PX 8 are overruled; (3) the objection to PX 13 is sustained, without prejudice to plaintiff's right to use certain documents in that group exhibit to impeach or to refresh recollection; (4) the Court reserves for trial the ruling on defendants' objections to PX14, PX15, PX16, and PX17; (5) the objections to PX 18 are overruled; (6) the objection to PX 20 is sustained; (7) the objection to PX 25 is sustain ed; (8) the objections to PX 26 are sustained to the extent set forth in the Court's ruling on defendants' motion in limine no. 1, and is reserved for trial as to other materials within the group exhibit; (9) the objection to PX 28 is overr uled; and (10) the Court reserves for trial the ruling on defendants' objections to PX 29. The Court issued the following rulings on plaintiff's objections, as set forth in the amended exhibit list, to defendant's exhibits: (1) the obj ection to DX 1 is sustained; (2) the Court reserves for trial the ruling on plaintiff's objection to DX24; (3) the objection to DX26 is sustained; and (4) the Court reserves ruling on the objections to DX27, pending the submission of briefing by the parties. By the close of business on 11/4/10 each of the parties shall submit a memorandum, not to exceed five pages, setting forth their respective positions. By 9:00 a.m. on 11/08/10, the parties shall file any revised/supplemental jury inst ructions. By agreement, the case will proceed before a jury of twelve persons, in Courtroom 1041, and the jurors will be permitted to ask questions using the procedure set forth on the record by the Court. (For further details see written opinion). Signed by the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier on 11/03/2010. Mailed notice. (jj, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perry v. Chicago Department of Police et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Devaris M. Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chicago Department of Police
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Watts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bartel Keithly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?