Coleman v. Godinez et al
| Carlton Coleman |
| S Godinez, Ramiro, Thomas, Walsh, Gavin, Sgt Leahy, Crot, Nalepa, Evers and Doe |
| 1:2008cv05974 |
| October 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) Office |
| Cook |
| Charles R. Norgle |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 2/3/2011: This case was recently transferred to this Court's calendar. A review of the plaintiff's letters concerning Howard Towles, the counsel who filed an appearance on the plai ntiff's behalf, reveal that Mr. Towles was suspended from practicing law. The Illinois Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission website shows that Mr. Towles is not authorized to practice in Illinois. Accordingly, Mr. Towles's appear ance is stricken. If the plaintiff wishes to move for appointment of counsel, he should first seek to obtain counsel by other means, and if those attempts are unsuccessful, he may file a motion for appointment of counsel, describing the need for coun sel in this particular case. The defendants shall submit a written status report using the template attached to the order (it need not be a joint report) by 2/18/2011. Status hearing set for 3/21/2011 at 8:30a.m. (For further details see Written Opinion.)Mailed notice.(psm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
