United States Of America v. Nolan
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Matthew Francis Nolan
Case Number: 1:2008mc00097
Filed: December 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
Presiding Judge: Martin C. Ashman
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Michael T. Mason on 12/1/2009.(rbf, )
August 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Request for Extradition Signed by the Honorable Michael T. Mason on 8/31/2009.(td, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States Of America v. Nolan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: AUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Francis Nolan
Represented By: Zachary Thomas Fardon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?