Lougheed v. Village of Mundelein

Plaintiff: Ryan Lougheed
Defendant: Village of Mundelein
Case Number: 1:2009cv01683
Filed: March 18, 2009
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: XX US, Outside the State of IL
Presiding Judge: Matthew F. Kennelly
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 19, 2010 41 Opinion or Order of the Court WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 7/19/2010: For the reasons stated below, the Court denies defendant's motion for summary judgment [docket no. 28 ]. The case is set for a status hearing on July 28, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. for the purpose of setting a trial date. Mailed notice(gmr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lougheed v. Village of Mundelein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ryan Lougheed
Represented By: Deanne Snedeker Medina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Village of Mundelein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?