Bajer Design & Marketing, Inc. v. Whitney Design, Inc.
Plaintiff: Bajer Design & Marketing, Inc.
Defendant: Whitney Design, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv01815
Filed: March 23, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Patent Office
County: XX US, Outside the State of IL
Presiding Judge: James B. Zagel
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:271 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 99 MOTION by Plaintiff Bajer Design & Marketing, Inc. for judgment Consent Judgment (Staes, Andrew)
June 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed on 6/26/2009.Mailed notice(drw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bajer Design & Marketing, Inc. v. Whitney Design, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bajer Design & Marketing, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew Theodore Staes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Whitney Design, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?