Holmes v. City of Chicago et al
Hugo Holmes |
City of Chicago, Michelle D. Acosta, E.S. Herrera, Jr., J.D. Matich, Veronica A. Coffee, M.J. Drisch and P.D. Ferraro |
1:2009cv02481 |
April 23, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Robert M. Dow |
Maria Valdez |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 293 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 11/1/2016. Mailed notice(cdh, ) |
Filing 217 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: the Court grants in part Defendants' motion for summary judgment 178 . The Court dismisses all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Herrera, Matich, and Coffee and also dismisses Plaintiff's claims against "Unknown Officers." The Court also dismisses Plaintiff's federal due process and conspiracy claims against Defendant Acosta as well as Plaintiff's state law claims for abuse of process, battery, assault, and conspiracy a gainst Defendant Acosta. Plaintiff's false arrest/imprisonment (state and federal), malicious prosecution, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims remain pending against Defendant Acosta. The Court also grants Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a sur-reply 208 . This case is set for further status hearing on August 26, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 8/6/2014. Mailed notice(tbk, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.