Terry v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
| Shanika Terry |
| Cook County Department of Corrections, Cermak Health Services of Cook County, Cook County, Thomas Dart, Cook County Sheriff, Cook County Bureau of Health, Cook County Jail, David Fagus and Other Unknown Defendants |
| 1:2009cv03093 |
| May 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Defendant |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Geraldine Soat Brown on 1/13/2011: For the reasons set out below, plaintiff's Second Motion to Take an Excess of Ten Depositions 153 is granted in a part and denied in part; Defendant Dart's Reques t for a Protective Order Barring his Deposition 130 is granted; and Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time to Answer 26(a)(2) 157 is granted. The dates for the completion of fact discovery and plaintiff's expert disclosures and reports will be set at the status hearing on 1/18/11. [For further details see minute order.] Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
|
Filing
100
Motion to bifurcate 70 is denied; Motion to stay 70 is denied; WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 7/8/2010. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 1/22/2010. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
