Wright v. City of Chicago et al

Plaintiff: Shawn Wright
Defendant: City of Chicago, Officer Perez, J. Mook and Other Chicago Police Officers Names Unknown
Case Number: 1:2009cv03489
Filed: June 9, 2009
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Elaine E. Bucklo
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 26, 2012 191 Opinion or Order of the Court WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 1/26/2012: Defendants' motion to enforce settlement are granted 180 190 . The City is directed to provide checks as follows: two for the attorneys' fees and expenses detailed h erein, one to St. Francis Hospital in the amount of $3,014.35, which shall discharge its lien against Mr. Wright, and a check to Shawn Wright in the amount of the settlement, less the amounts for fees, expenses and lien. When this is complete, t he parties shall notify the court, and this case will be dismissed with prejudice. Motion for attorney fees and costs 188 is granted. Motion to withdraw as counsel for the plaintiff by Michael Rothmann 186 is also granted. Mailed notice. [For further details see written opinion.](ea, )
November 23, 2010 81 Opinion or Order of the Court MINUTE entry before Honorable Geraldine Soat Brown: For the reasons set out below, Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order to Limit the Extent of Discovery 67 is granted. Defendants will not be required to answer Interrogatories 14, 18, 20, 21 and 22, and will not be required to respond to Document Requests 10, 15, 19 and 29 through 43, inclusive. This is without prejudice to any specific objection defendants may have made regarding any other interrogatory or document request. Any such specific objections are not the subject of this order. [For further details see minute order.] Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. City of Chicago et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Wright
Represented By: Michael Rothmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Chicago
Represented By: Naomi Ann Avendano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Mook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Other Chicago Police Officers Names Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?