Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company, The v. Great Banc Trust Company, as trustee of the Horace Windham 2007 Insurance Trust et al
Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company, The |
Great Banc Trust Company, as trustee of the Horace Windham 2007 Insurance Trust, Horace Windham, Kevin Bechtel and Steven Brasner |
1:2009cv06366 |
October 9, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Wayne R. Andersen |
Plaintiff |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 186 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 6/8/2012. Mailed notice by judge's staff. (srb,) |
Filing 90 WRITTEN Opinion by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 10/27/2010: For the reasons set forth in the Statement section of this order, defendant Kevin Bechtel's motion to dismiss 70 is denied and counterdefendant The Penn Mutual Life Insurance C ompany's motion to dismiss 45 is granted. Bechtel's Answer is due on or before 11/12/2010. Counsel for all parties are requested to meetpursuant to Rule 26(f) and jointly file a Form 52 on or before 11/30/2010. Status hearing set for 12/2/2010 at 9:00 a.m. for purposes of scheduling further dates. Parties are encouraged to discuss settlement. [ For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice(hp, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.