Gills v. Dart et al
Jaryan J Gills |
Salvador Godinez, Officer Brown, Medical Director, Thomas Dart, Unnamed Officer and X-Ray Technician |
1:2009cv07210 |
November 25, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Suzanne B. Conlon |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 117 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon on 11/14/2011: The Plaintiff's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis # 116 is denied. The Court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith and orders the plaintiff to p ay the appellate fees of $455 within fourteen days or the Court of Appeals may dismiss his appeal for want of prosecution. The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the PLRA Attorney, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Mailed notice (For further details see Written Opinion) (nf, ) |
Filing 48 WRITTEN Opinion The defendants' motion to dismiss [#38] is granted. Defendants Thomas Dart and Salvador Godinez are terminated as defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 15(a). The plaintiff's motion for reconsideration [#46] an d renewed motion for leave to amend [#44] are granted. The clerk is directed to issue summonses for service of the third amended complaint by U.S. Marshals Service. The plaintiff's fourth motion for appointment of counsel [#45] is denied. Signed by the Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon on 8/6/2010.Mailed notice(air, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.