Mitchem v. Illinois Collection Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: James A Mitchem
Defendant: Illinois Collection Service, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv07274
Filed: November 19, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Du Page
Presiding Judge: Ronald A. Guzman
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 80 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 1/3/2011. Mailed notice (cjg, )
July 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 7/29/2010. Mailed notice (cjg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchem v. Illinois Collection Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James A Mitchem
Represented By: Curtis Charles Warner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Illinois Collection Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?