Insubuy, Inc. v. Community Insurance Agency et al
| Insubuy, Inc. |
| Community Insurance Agency, Ramesh J. Patel, Gubman N. Moore, Inc. and Robert M. Chorzepa |
| 1:2010cv03925 |
| June 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Amy J. St. Eve |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
161
MOTION by Counter Defendant narendra khatri, Plaintiff Insubuy, Inc. for partial summary judgment , for partial dismissal of defendant's counterclaim, MOTION by Counter Defendant narendra khatri, Plaintiff Insubuy, Inc. for judgment on claims five and six (Schweitzer, Fritz)
|
|
Filing
77
WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 11/9/2010: The Court, in its discretion, grants Counter-Plaintiff Community Insurance Agency's ("CIA") motion for expedited jurisdictional discovery 65 . Counter-Plaintiff CIA must serve its document requests and interrogatories by no later than 11/11/10. Counter-Defendant Khatri must serve his responses to CIA's written discovery by no later than 12/1/10. Counter-Defendant Khatri's deposition must take place by 12/13/10. Counter-Plaintiff CIA must then file its Amended Response to Khatri's motion to dismiss based on lack of personal jurisdiction by no later than 12/23/10. [For further details see minute order.] Mailed notice(kef, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
