State of Michigan, et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
State of Wisconsin, State of Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of Ohio and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania |
United States Army Corps Of Engineers and Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago |
1:2010cv04457 |
July 19, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
XX US, Outside the State of IL |
Robert M. Dow |
Environmental Matters |
30 U.S.C. ยง 181 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 243 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 12/3/2012:Mailed notice(air, ) |
Filing 193 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 3/31/2011: This matter is before the Court on Defendants motion to stay 183 all district court proceedings during the pendency of Plaintiffs appeal of the Courts December 2, 2010 Order 155 denying the requested preliminary injunction. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants motion 183 is denied in part and granted in part. Any party may move to lift the partial stay at any time for good cause. The Court will set a status date in a future minute order. Notices Mailed by Judge's Staff (tbk, ) |
Filing 155 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 12/2/2010. Mailed notice(tbk, ) |
Filing 101 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 8/20/2010:Mailed notice(jms, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.