Smith v. Dart et al
| Seneca Smith |
| Tom Dart, Salvador Godinez, Martinez, Conley, Farris, Martierie, Blunt, Alverez and Wilson |
| 1:2010cv06395 |
| October 6, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Will |
| Elaine E. Bucklo |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
145
Enter MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 1/28/2013. Mailed notice (jdh)
|
|
Filing
19
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 2/14/2011: Mailed notice(mpj, )
|
|
Filing
4
WRITTEN Opinion: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [#3] is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's current place of incarceration to deduct $31.73 from Plaintiff's account for paymen t to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial filing fee. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at Stateville Correctional Center. However, Superintendent Martinez, Tom Dart and Salvador Godinez are dismissed as Defendan ts. The Clerk is directed to issue summonses for Defendants Conley, Farris, Martierie, Blunt, Alverez, and Wilson. The Clerk is also directed to send Plaintiff a magistrate judge consent form and filing instructions along with a copy of this order. Status hearing set for 12/17/10 at 9:30 a.m. Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 10/12/2010. Mailed notice(vcf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
