Taylor et al v. Cook County et al
| Tracey Taylor |
| Cook County, Tom Dart and Commandor Franko |
| 1:2011cv07427 |
| October 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Virginia M. Kendall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 5/23/2013. Mailed notice(tsa, )
|
|
Filing
8
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 11/15/2011. Plaintiff Tracey Taylor's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 5 is granted. The Court authorizes and orders Cook County Jail officials to deduct $5.08 from Plaint iff's account, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the Supervisor of Inmate Trust Fund Accounts, Cook County Dept. of Corrections Administrative Office, Division V , 2700 S. California, Chicago, IL 60608. Plaintiff Eddie Daugherty is dismissed from this action for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. The Clerk is directed to dismiss Daugherty as a Plaintiff in this action. In light of his dismissal, Daugherty's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 6 is denied. Plaintiff Taylor's amended complaint 7 is accepted. Defendants Director Miller, Aramark Food Service and unknown agent are dismissed from this action. All previously dismissed - Defendants remain dismissed. The Clerk shall issue summonses to the remaining named Defendants, Cook County and Thomas Dart, and send Plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form, Instructions for Submitting Documents, and a copy of this order. The Clerk shall send Plaintiff Daugherty a copy of this order. [For further detail see minute order.] Mailed notice (lw, ).
|
|
Filing
4
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 10/24/2011. This complaint has been filed by two Plaintiffs. Both Plaintiffs must either file an i.f.p. application on the proper form with the information required by Section 1915(a)(2) or pay the full $350 filing fee. The complaint 1 is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff(s) are given leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days of this order. If an amended complaint is filed, Plaintiff(s) must also show cause in writing why the amended complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to fully exhaust his administrative remedies. The Clerk is directed to send each Plaintiff an i.f.p. application and an amended complaint form with instr uctions. The Court will review any amended complaint that is filed and each Plaintiff still a party to this action shall be held accountable for all the consequences addressed below. Plaintiff (s)' failure to: (1) submit an i.f.p. application or pay the full $350 filing fee, (2) submit an amended complaint, and (3) show cause in writing why any amended complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies will result in dismissal of this case on the understanding that they do not wish to proceed with this action in federal court at this time. [For further detail see written opinion.] Mailed notice (lw, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
