Holmes Jr v. McDonough et al
| Timothy Holmes Jr |
| Matthew McDonough and Thomas M Mason |
| 1:2011cv07610 |
| October 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Vermilion |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 4/26/2012: Plaintiff's motion to reconsider 9 is denied. The proposed amended complaint is stricken pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The case remains closed. Mailed notice (For further detail see Written Opinion) (nf, )
|
|
Filing
4
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 1/9/2012: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file in forma pauperis 3 is granted. On initial review pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 1915A, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing, by 2 /6/2012, why this case should not be dismissed as time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations. The trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of confinement is authorized and ordered to make deductions from his account and payments to the clerk of court in accordance with this order. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at the Danville Correctional Center. (For further details see written opinion.) Mailed notice (tg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
