James v. State Of Illinois et al
| Samuel James |
| Detective Long, State Of Illinois, Cook County Department of Correction and Chicago Harrison and Kidzie Police Station |
| 1:2011cv07769 |
| November 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Ronald A. Guzman |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 12/1/2011: Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application 3 is denied without prejudice to him submitting a completed application. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudic e to him submitting an amended complaint. To proceed with this case, Plaintiff must, within 30 days of the date of this order, (1) either prepay the $350 filing fee or submit a completed in forma pauperis application, and (2) submit an amended c omplaint in accordance with this order. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in summary dismissal of this case. Plaintiff's motions for the appointment of counsel 4 , 5 are denied without prejudice. The clerk is directed to send to Plaintiff an in forma pauperis application and an amended complaint form, along with a copy of this order. Mailed notice. [For further details see written opinion.](ea, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
