Carr v. Towles

Carr v. Towles

Plaintiff:	Heggie Carr
Defendant:	Howard Towles
Case Number:	1:2012cv07684
Filed:	September 25, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Brown
Presiding Judge:	Harry D. Leinenweber
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 5, 2012	Filing 9 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 11/5/2012:The plaintiff's renewed motion for leave to file in forma pauperis # 8 is granted. The court authorizes and orders prison officials to begin making monthly deductions toward payment of the filing fee in accordance with this order. The clerk shall send a copy of this order to the trust fund supervisor at the Western Illinois Correctional Center. However, the complaint is summarily dismissed on initial review pu rsuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state an actionable federal claim. The case is terminated. The plaintiff's motions for appointment of counsel # 4 and for service of process at government expense # 5 are denied as moot. This dismissal counts as one of the plaintiff's three allotted dismissals under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). [For further details see written opinion.] mailed notice (tg, )
October 2, 2012	Filing 7 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 10/2/2012: The plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis # 3 is denied, without prejudice. The plaintiff is directed to submit a renewed i.f.p. petition that is certified by a t rust fund officer; he must also attach copies of his prison trust fund ledgers showing his income for the six months preceding the filing of this action [that is, from March 25, 2012, through September 25, 2012]. Failure to comply within thirty day s of the date of this order will result in denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis and summary dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to provide the plaintiff with a blank i.f.p. petition along with a copy of this order. The plaintiff is reminded that he must provide the court with the original plus a judges copy of every document filed. Mailed notice. (For further details see opinion).(pcs, )

Date Filed

Document Text

November 5, 2012

Filing 9 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 11/5/2012:The plaintiff's renewed motion for leave to file in forma pauperis # 8 is granted. The court authorizes and orders prison officials to begin making monthly deductions toward payment of the filing fee in accordance with this order. The clerk shall send a copy of this order to the trust fund supervisor at the Western Illinois Correctional Center. However, the complaint is summarily dismissed on initial review pu rsuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state an actionable federal claim. The case is terminated. The plaintiff's motions for appointment of counsel # 4 and for service of process at government expense # 5 are denied as moot. This dismissal counts as one of the plaintiff's three allotted dismissals under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). [For further details see written opinion.] mailed notice (tg, )

October 2, 2012

Filing 7 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 10/2/2012: The plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis # 3 is denied, without prejudice. The plaintiff is directed to submit a renewed i.f.p. petition that is certified by a t rust fund officer; he must also attach copies of his prison trust fund ledgers showing his income for the six months preceding the filing of this action [that is, from March 25, 2012, through September 25, 2012]. Failure to comply within thirty day s of the date of this order will result in denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis and summary dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to provide the plaintiff with a blank i.f.p. petition along with a copy of this order. The plaintiff is reminded that he must provide the court with the original plus a judges copy of every document filed. Mailed notice. (For further details see opinion).(pcs, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carr v. Towles
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Howard Towles
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heggie Carr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?