May v. Hodges et al
| Lester May |
| Warden Hodges and Lisa Madigan |
| 1:2012cv08968 |
| November 8, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Lawrence |
| John Z. Lee |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 1/10/2013:Petitioner has responded to the Court's November 26, 2012, order to show cause and satisfactorily pled that his petition is timely. Accordingly, Respondent is ordered to answer the petition or otherwise plead within thirty days of the date of this order. On the Court's own motion, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan is dismissed as a party. Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel # 4 is denied as premature. [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (tg, )
|
|
Filing
5
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 11/26/2012. Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [# 3 ] is granted. However, Petitioner is ordered to show good cause in writing why his habeas petition should not be dismissed as time-barred. Failure to show good cause within thirty days of the date of this order will result in summary dismissal of this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. [For further details see minute order.] Mailed notice (lw, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
