Porras v. Tarr et al
| Billy Porras |
| Cheri Tarr, R. Tejarto, Helen Hamilton, Angelica Joyner, Randy S. Pfister and Hastings |
| 1:2013cv03368 |
| May 3, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Randolph |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 10/13/2015. Mailed notice(cdh, )
|
|
Filing
5
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 7/8/2013: For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion for leave to file in forma pauperis 4 and denies Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation 3 . The Court authorizes and orders Menard Correctional Center trust officials to deduct $61.61 from Plaintiff's account and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the inmate trust accounts office at Menard Correctional Center. The Clerk shall issue summonses to Defendants, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve them. The Clerk is further directed to send Plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form, Instructions for Submitting Documents, and a copy of this order. [For further details see opinion.] Mailed notice. (np, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
