Maxwell v. R.A. Pearson Company
Plaintiff:
Lisa Maxwell
Defendant:
R.A. Pearson Company
Case Number:
1:2013cv03822
Filed:
May 23, 2013
Court:
Illinois Northern District Court
Office:
Chicago Office
County:
Cook
Presiding Judge:
Robert W. Gettleman
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:
29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Maxwell v. R.A. Pearson Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: R.A. Pearson Company | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Timothy Buckley |
| Represented By: | Stephanie Ann Cantrell |
| Represented By: | Katherine Ann Rodosky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lisa Maxwell | |
| Represented By: | Bradley J. Smith |
| Represented By: | Eugene K. Hollander |
| Represented By: | Paul W. Ryan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
