Cheney v. Standard Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Carole Cheney
Defendant: Standard Insurance Company and Long Term Disability Insurance
Case Number: 1:2013cv04269
Filed: June 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Ruben Castillo
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 101 MOTION by Plaintiff Carole Cheney for judgment (DeBofsky, Mark)
May 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 94 MOTION by Defendants Long Term Disability Insurance, Standard Insurance Company for judgment , Standard Insurance Company's and the ERISA Plan's Motion for Entry of Judgment (Herring, Jacqueline)
March 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER: Plaintiff Carole Cheney and Defendants Standard Insurance Company and the ERISA Plan have submitted briefs on the appropriate calculation of Predisability Earnings. For the reasons stated we hereby grant Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Judgment 29 and Deny Defendants' Motion for Entry of Judgment 38 . [For further details see order] - Signed by the Honorable Susan E. Cox on 3/13/2015. Mailed notice (np, )
August 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER: This is an ERISA action to determine whether plaintiff had insurance coverage on the date of her alleged disability and, if so, whether plaintiff established that she was disabled within the meaning of the policy. The parties agreed to a trial on the stipulated paper record, therefore, before us are both Plaintiff Carole Cheney's Motion for Entry of Judgment [dkt. 29] and Defendants Long Term Disability Insurance and Standard Insurance Company's Motion for Judgment [dkt. 38]. For the reasons provided, we hereby grant plaintiff's motion and deny defendants' motion. Signed by the Honorable Susan E. Cox on 8/28/2014. [For further details see order.] Mailed notice (np, )
December 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MOTION by Defendants Long Term Disability Insurance, Standard Insurance Company for judgment , Standard Insurance Company's and the ERISA Plan's Motion for Entry of Judgment (Herring, Jacqueline)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cheney v. Standard Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carole Cheney
Represented By: Mark D. DeBofsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Standard Insurance Company
Represented By: Jacqueline J. Herring
Represented By: W. Sebastian von Schleicher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Long Term Disability Insurance
Represented By: W. Sebastian von Schleicher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?