American Postal Workers Union, O'Hare Midway "T" Local 7011 et al v. American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO

Plaintiff: American Postal Workers Union, O'Hare Midway "T" Local 7011, Donald Greer, Patrick Hooper, Saunder Jones and Thais Hampton
Defendant: American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO
Case Number: 1:2013cv07281
Filed: October 10, 2013
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Matthew F. Kennelly
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: 29:185
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 18, 2015 43 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on February 18, 2015: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court grants APWU's motion to dismiss [dkt. no. 34]. Although it is high ly unlikely that the defects can be cured by amendment, the Court will give Local 7011 a chance to try. Unless Local 7011 files a proposed amended complaint by no later than March 11, 2015 that states a viable federal claim, the Court will enter judgment in favor of APWU. The case is set for a status hearing on March 20, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. (mk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: American Postal Workers Union, O'Hare Midway "T" Local 7011 et al v. American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: American Postal Workers Union, O'Hare Midway "T" Local 7011
Represented By: Brian C. Hlavin
Represented By: Patrick N. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Greer
Represented By: Brian C. Hlavin
Represented By: Patrick N. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick Hooper
Represented By: Brian C. Hlavin
Represented By: Patrick N. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saunder Jones
Represented By: Brian C. Hlavin
Represented By: Patrick N. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thais Hampton
Represented By: Brian C. Hlavin
Represented By: Patrick N. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO
Represented By: Thomas Deacon Allison
Represented By: Karen I. Engelhardt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.