Chey v. Orbitz Worldwide, Inc. et al
Plaintiff:
Timothy Chey
Defendant:
Orbitz Worldwide, Inc. and Does 1-10
Case Number:
1:2013cv08448
Filed:
November 21, 2013
Court:
Illinois Northern District Court
Office:
Chicago Office
County:
XX US, Outside the State of IL
Presiding Judge:
Sharon Johnson Coleman
Nature of Suit:
Other Fraud
Cause of Action:
28:1332
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| November 21, 2013 | 45 |
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT AIR CHINA, LTD'S MOTION TO DISMISS, DOC. NO. 26 ; (2) GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT ORBITZ WORLDWIDE, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO IMPROPER VENUE, DOC. NO. 28 ; AND (3) TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE NORTHERN DISTR ICT OF ILLINOIS. Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 11/21/2013. [Written Order follows hearing held 10/29/2013. Minutes of hearing: doc no. 39 ] (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEPartici pants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. CASE TO BE ELECTRONICALLY TRANSFERRED TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. [Transferred from Hawaii on 11/22/2013.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
