Novak et al v. Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC et al
| Michael J. Novak, Christina Bugelas Novak and T.N. |
| Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC, Lieberman Management Services, Inc., Donna Weber, Board of Directors and The State Parkway Condominium Association |
| 1:2013cv08861 |
| December 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Milton I. Shadur |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
510
ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Depositions of Michael J. Novak and Christina Bugelas Novak 499 is denied. See attached Statement for further details. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 8/21/2017. Mailed notice (ber, )
|
|
Filing
480
ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Protective Order under Rule 26(c)(1)(B) 477 is granted in part and denied in part. The motion hearing noticed for 6/15/17 at 9:15 a.m. 477 is stricken. Status hearing for a report on the parties' progress with discovery set for 6/19/17 at 2:30 p.m. See attached Statement for further details. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 6/9/2017. Mailed notice(ber, )
|
|
Filing
447
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiffs' Instanter for Leave to File a Verified Sur-Response to Defendants' Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to Return Documents Protec ted by Attorney-Client Privilege [ECF No. 434] is denied, and Defendants' Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to Return Documents Protected by Attorney-Client Privilege [ECF No. 421] is granted. On or before March 23, 2017, Plaintiffs must (1) return t o Defendants the original copies of the documents Bates-stamped SP01534615357, SP01536015369, SP01537615382, SP015395, SP01541015412, SP01543215436, and SP01544015442 that Defendants produced to Plaintiffs; and (2) destroy any copies Plaintiffs have made of those documents. If Defendants have not already produced to Plaintiffs redacted copies of the inadvertently produced documents, they must do so on or before March 23, 2017. See attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 3/20/2017. Mailed notice (ber, )
|
|
Filing
342
ORDER: Defendants' Second Amended Motion for Protective Order [ECF No. 276] is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants shall produce the documents that they are required to produce in accordance with this Order by 7/11/16, which is 15 days from the date of this Order. A status hearing is set for 8/4/16 at 11:00 a.m. See attached Statement for further details. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 6/24/2016. Mailed notice (ber, )
|
|
Filing
265
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, the defense motion for partial summary judgment 241 is denied. Plaintiffs' motion to file sur-reply 261 on that motion is denied as unnecessary. In view of the discovery referral, the status hearing of 11/12/2015 is reset to 12/16/2015 at 10:30 AM. Emailed notice(slb, )
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Order, Defendants' motion to dismiss T.N. [R. 126] is denied; Defendants' motion to dismiss the Board of Directors [R. 128] is granted, and the Board shall be te rminated as a named Defendant; and Plaintiffs' motion to lift the stay on discovery of the two discrete issues [R. 140] is denied without prejudice. If Plaintiffs still wish to ask for leave to amend the complaint to name individual Board member s, then Plaintiffs must file the motion for leave to do so by 03/16/2015. Defendants shall respond by 03/30/2015. Plaintiffs may reply by 04/08/2015. Only after the Court has decided that motion (if it is filed) may Defendants then file a motion to dismiss certain claims and parties as described in the Order. Emailed notice(slb, )
|
|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, the Association Defendants' motion to dismiss or to stay 41 is granted in part and denied in part: the federal FHA claim is intact, wi th only two issues stayed for discovery, and the state-law claims are dismissed. Defendant Levenfeld Pearlstein's motion to dismiss 42 is granted in its entirety. The Clerk shall terminate Defendant Levenfeld Pearlstein as a named Defendant. The status hearing of 09/26/2014 remains as scheduled. Emailed notice(slb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
