Kamyk v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Northern District Kamyk v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Kamyk v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Kazimiera Kamyk
Defendant:	Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Case Number:	1:2015cv04229
Filed:	May 13, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Rebecca R. Pallmeyer
Nature of Suit:	Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 14, 2016	Filing 26 ORDER: Plaintiff Kazimiera Kamyk ("Plaintiff") appeals the Commissioner of Social Security's decision that the Windfall Elimination Provision ("WEP") was properly applied to her Social Security retirement benefits. A motion f or summary judgment 23 has been filed on behalf of Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner"). Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court will construe plaintiffs "answer" in supp ort of reversing the decision of the Commissioner as a motion. For the reasons outlined below, we grant the Commissioner's motion [dkt. 16] and deny the Plaintiff's motion [dkt. 24]. The Administrative Law Judges decision is affirmed. [For further details see order] - Signed by the Honorable Susan E. Cox on 9/14/2016. Mailed notice (np, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 14, 2016

Filing 26 ORDER: Plaintiff Kazimiera Kamyk ("Plaintiff") appeals the Commissioner of Social Security's decision that the Windfall Elimination Provision ("WEP") was properly applied to her Social Security retirement benefits. A motion f or summary judgment 23 has been filed on behalf of Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner"). Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court will construe plaintiffs "answer" in supp ort of reversing the decision of the Commissioner as a motion. For the reasons outlined below, we grant the Commissioner's motion [dkt. 16] and deny the Plaintiff's motion [dkt. 24]. The Administrative Law Judges decision is affirmed. [For further details see order] - Signed by the Honorable Susan E. Cox on 9/14/2016. Mailed notice (np, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kamyk v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kazimiera Kamyk
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Represented By:	AUSA-SSA
Represented By:	Daniel Edward May
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?