McKenzie v. Slaughter et al
| Darnell McKenzie |
| Slaughter and Teague |
| 1:2015cv08190 |
| September 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Jorge L. Alonso |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Plaintiff's "motion to dismiss Defendant's motion for summary judgment for failure to reply to Plaintiff answer to Defendant motion for summary judgment" 86 is denied. Defendant's motion to sup plement motion for summary judgment 95 , which merely seeks leave to file the supplement requested by the Court, is granted. Defendants' motion for summary judgment 72 is granted in part and denied in part. McKenzie's federal false arres t claims are dismissed with prejudice. Defendant's motion is denied as to Plaintiff's claim that his post-legal-process pretrial detention was unlawful. Plaintiff's motion for status hearing date 99 is granted. This case is set for s tatus on October 4, 2017, at 10:15 a.m. The parties are to discuss potential resolution of this lawsuit prior to the status date. Plaintiff's motion for up date [sic] on status hearing for summary judgment court hearing 88 is denied as moot. Defendant's counsel shall arrange for Plaintiff to be present at the status hearing by telephone. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 9/1/2017. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
