Holliman v. Thompson et al
| John A Holliman |
| Dennis Thompson, COUNTY OF COOK, IL and Sheriff Of Cook County Illinois |
| 1:2015cv09050 |
| October 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Robert W. Gettleman |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
228
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendants Dennis Thompson and Charles Brazelton's motions for summary judgment (Docs. 164 and 170 ) are denied. Defendant Cook County's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 170 ) is granted as to Thomp son, but denied as to Brazelton. Three claims remain: (1) a Fourteenth Amendment claim against Thompson; (2) a Fourteenth Amendment reckless disregard claim against Brazelton, and (3) an indemnification claim against Cook County for Brazelton's conduct. This matter is set for a report on status on April 10, 2019, at 9:10 a.m. Mailed notice (cn).
|
|
Filing
71
Memorandum Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 9/6/2016: Motions to dismiss 45 49 are granted in part and denied in part. Answers to the first amended complaint are due by 9/28/2016. A joint status report is due by 10/3/2016. Status hearing date of 9/8/2016 is reset to 10/11/2016 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (gds)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
