Wheeler v. Midland Funding LLC et al
| Kevin Wheeler |
| Midland Funding LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc. and Encore Capital Group, Inc. |
| 1:2015cv11152 |
| December 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Virginia M. Kendall |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
209
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 3/26/2020. The Court grants in part and denies in part Wheeler's Motion for Summary Judgment 165 . The Court denies Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [ 163] and dismisses Defendants' Motion to bar Goldsmith 160 as moot. The Court concludes that Wheeler has standing and that he has established that MCM violated the FDCPA. Consistent with this Opinion, the case will proceed to trial on damages and on whether Midland Funding and Encore may be held liable. See Opinion for further details. Mailed notice(lk, )
|
|
Filing
91
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 4/24/2018. Plaintiff Wheeler's Renewed Motion for Class Certification 62 is granted. Mailed notice(lk, )
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 7/31/2017. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 44 is denied. Mailed notice(lk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
