Hoke v. Abrams et al
Rita Hoke |
Daniel Abrams and Ashwinie Sharan |
1:2016cv01174 |
January 26, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Lake |
Thomas M. Durkin |
Other Labor Litigation |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 111 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, Abrams and Sharan's motion for summary judgment, R. 67 , is denied; Hoke's motion for summary judgment on Abrams and Sharan's second and third affirmative defenses, R. 69 , is granted; and Horan's motion for summary judgment on Abrams and Sharan's third party complaint, R. 72 , is granted. A status hearing is set for February 22, 2018 at 9:00 a.m., at which at the parties should be prepared to set a trial date. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 2/8/2018:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Filing 63 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum opinion and order, Abrams's and Sharan's motion for judgment on the pleadings 44 ,is denied. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 1/12/2017:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Filing 44 MOTION by Defendants Daniel Abrams, Ashwinie Sharan for judgment on the Pleadings and for Dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint (Csajaghy, Stephen) |
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, the Court granted Hoke's motion to dismiss, and dismissed Defendants' counterclaim with prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 7/19/2016:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.