Myers v. City of Chicago Dept of Housing
Ben Myers |
City of Chicago Dept of Housing |
1:2016cv05734 |
May 31, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Milton I. Shadur |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM Order: For the reasons stated in this memorandum order, the computerized random reassignment of this Court's calendar among its colleague is scheduled to take place before the end of this month. In the meantime the Motion to Dismiss will have to lie fallow. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 8/8/2017:Mailed notice(clw, ) |
Filing 32 MEMORANDUM Order: Plaintiff Nathan Myers ("Myers") has filed a 12-page pro se1 "Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion To Dismiss Complaint" filed by the Chicago Housing Authority. That Response calls for a reply, which is ordered to be filed on or before July 21, 2017. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 6/30/2017:Mailed notice(clw, ) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM Order. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 12/29/2016:Mailed notice(clw, ) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM Order: Plaintiff's motion for time to add two additional counts on equal protection 11 is denied. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 9/29/2016:Mailed notice(clw, ) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM Order: Plaintiff did not appear for the status hearing on 8/26/2016. This Court will give Myers one more chance. It sets 8:45 a.m. September 6, 2016 as the next date for Myers to appear in court and to submit a proposed Amended Complaint, failing which this action will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 8/26/2016:Mailed notice(clw, ) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The complaint is stricken. Both Myers himself and Affordable will have to include, in any Amended Complaint, a proper identification of provisions of the federal fair housing laws or of the federal Constitution or both to confirm their standing to bring this action. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 7/8/2016:Mailed notice(clw, ) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM Order: This Court hereby orders: 1. that the missing copy of the complaint be delivered to this Court's chambers forthwith and 2. that such delivery be accompanied by a check for $200 payable to the "Clerk of the District Court" by reason of the LR 5.2(f) violation, a requirement foreshadowed by the opening provision in this Court's website. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 7/1/2016:Mailed notice(clw, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Myers v. City of Chicago Dept of Housing | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ben Myers | |
Represented By: | Nathan Benjamin Myers |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City of Chicago Dept of Housing | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.